<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-GB" link="#467886" vlink="#96607D" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Hi all,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">This may be of interest, if you want to compare where we stand in comparison with the other groups.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">The first round of internal peer review is due tonight, so we will soon see how they evaluate papers.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">You will see that I have taken a very different approach from the other groups and been much more selective in what I included. We can discuss our approach once we have a clearer
view of how the first round of reviews has gone.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Kind regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Bernd<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"> Andy Crabtree (staff) <pszaxc@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 07 March 2025 14:56<br>
<b>To:</b> Thorsten Altenkirch (staff) <psztxa@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Steve Benford (staff) <pszsdb@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Praminda Caleb-Solly (staff) <pszpc1@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Joel Fischer (staff) <pszjf1@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Andrew French
(staff) <sbzapf@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Steven Furnell (staff) <pszsf@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Chris Greenhalgh (staff) <pszcmg@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Gail Hopkins (staff) <pszgtr@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Graham Hutton (staff) <pszgmh@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>;
Boriana Koleva (staff) <pszbnk@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Nicolai Kraus (staff) <psznk@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Ayse Kucukyilmaz (staff) <pszak1@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Dario Landa Silva (staff) <pszjds@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Robert Laramee (staff) <pszrsl@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>;
Ender Ozcan (staff) <pszeo@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Elvira Perez Vallejos (staff) <mszep@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Rong Qu (staff) <pszrq@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Bernd Stahl (staff) <pszbcs@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Craig Vear (staff) <amzcv@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>;
Christian Wagner (staff) <pszcw@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Michael Pound (staff) <sbzmpp@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk>; Max Wilson (staff) <pszmw@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk><br>
<b>Subject:</b> REF outputs spreadsheet <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Hi,<br>
<br>
Attached are the collated outputs minus those that were not affiliated to UoN, are not yet published (no DOI or URL, these can be add in the next round), and a poster
<br>
<br>
There are 250 outputs in total, but 62 are not eligible at this point (not in RIS, not discoverable, or not OA), which leaves us with 188 to review (it may rise if some of those not currently eligible become so, people are are trying to fix them)<br>
<br>
You will find FWCI for each output where available in the spreadsheet (N/A means not available in Scopus when I looked them up … Rong has a paper with an FWCI of 138!!! by the way, wow). I’ll send out a list of reviews for each of you next week.<br>
<br>
Thanks to those of you who are getting reviews back to me already, that’s great, keep ‘em coming, a steady drip is the way to do this I think (don’t leave them to pile up)
<br>
<br>
Hope you have a good weekend,<br>
<br>
andy<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>