[Maths-Education] Re: research on feedback and formative assessment?

[Alison Clark-Wilson]

Hi Kate and all,

Newcastle University is leading a 3-year EU funded project on just this
theme (in mathematics and science education, with an emphasis on
addressing low attainment)

Improving Progress for Lower Achievers through Formative Assessment in
Science and Mathematics Education (FaSMEd)

https://research.ncl.ac.uk/fasmed/


Their literature review will be useful to you I am sureŠ
Alison


Dr Alison Clark-Wilson

Research Fellow
London Knowledge Lab
Institute of Education
23-29 Emerald St
London
WC1N 3QS

phone: 00 44 (0)7815 609791
email: a.clark-wilson at ioe.ac.uk






On 23/10/2014 21:11, "Kate Mackrell" <katemackrell at sympatico.ca> wrote:

>CEMSE at the University of Chicago is trying to "cover all bases" in a
>proposal re the above in a technology environment.  We have found some
>excellent literature (see refs below), but wonder if there is any other
>interesting stuff out there that people know about.  In particular, we
>are looking for:
>
>a.  any frameworks for feedback and formative assessment in technological
>environments?
>
>b. any recent evidence re the frequency of feedback/formative assessment
>in classrooms?
>
>We'd also love to hear from anyone doing similar work!
>
>Kate Mackrell
>
>Bibliography so far:
>
>Bellman, A., Foshay, W., & Gremillion, D. (2014). A developmental model
>for adaptive and differentiated instruction using classroom networking
>technology. In A. Clark-Wilson et al. (Eds.), The Mathematics Teacher in
>the Digital Era, Springer: Dordrecht.
>
>Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning.
>Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7­74.
>
>Drijvers, P., Boon, P., Doorman, M., Bokhove, C., & Tacoma, S. (2013).
>Digital design: RME principles for designing online tasks. In C.
>Margolinas (Ed.). Task Design in Mathematics Education: Proceedings of
>ICMI Study 22, 55-62.
>
>Geiger, V., & Redmond, T. (2013). Designing mathematical modelling tasks
>in a technology rich secondary school context. In C. Margolinas (Ed.).
>Task Design in Mathematics Education: Proceedings of ICMI Study 22,
>121-130.
>
>Gutierrez-Santos, S., Mavrikis, M., & Magoulas, G. (2010). Layered
>development and evaluation for Intelligent Support in Exploratory
>Environments: the case of microworlds. Volume 6094 of Lecture Notes in
>Computer Science, pp. 105-114. Heidelberg: Springer.
>
>Hattie, J. & Helen Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback, Review of
>Educational Research, 77(1), 81­112.
>
>Joubert, M. (2013) Using computers in classroom mathematical tasks:
>revisiting theory to develop recommendations for the design of tasks. In
>C. Margolinas (Ed.) Task Design in Mathematics Education: Proceedings of
>ICMI Study 22, 71-80.
>
>Lee, H., Feldman, A., & Beatty, I. (2012). Factors that affect science
>and mathematics teachers¹ initial implementation of technology-enhanced
>formative assessment using a classroom response system, J Sci Educ
>Technol, 21, 523­539.
>
>Mackrell, K., Maschietto, M., & Soury-Lavergne, S. (2013). The
>interaction between task design and technology design in creating tasks
>with Cabri Elem.  In C. Margolinas (Ed.) Task Design in Mathematics
>Education: Proceedings of ICMI Study 22, 81-90.
>
>Mavrikis, M., Noss, R., Hoyles, C., & Geraniou E. (2013). Sowing the
>seeds of algebraic generalisation: designing epistemic affordances for an
>intelligent microworld. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1),
>68-85.
>
>Mavrikis, M., & Gutierrez-Santos, S. (2010). Not all wizards are from Oz:
>Iterative design of intelligent learning environments by communication
>capacity tapering, Computers & Education, 54, 641­651.
>
>Moreno, R. (2004). Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: effects
>of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia,
>Instructional Science, 32, 99­113.
>
>Pellegrino, J. W. (2010). Technology and formative assessment. In P.
>Peterson, E. Baker & B. McGaw (Eds.) International Encyclopedia of
>Education (Third Edition), 42-47. University of Illinois at Chicago:
>Chicago, IL.
>
>Sangwin, C., Cazes, C., Lee, A. & Wong, K. (2010). Micro-level automatic
>assessment supported by digital technologies. In C. Hoyles & J.-B.
>Lagrange (Eds.), Mathematics Education and Technology-Rethinking the
>Terrain, 227-250. Springer.
>
>Stacey, K., & Wiliam, D. (2013). Technology and Assessment in
>Mathematics. In M. A. Clements et al. (Eds.), Third International
>Handbook of Mathematics Education, 721-751. Springer: New York.
>
>Warner, Z. (2011). Adoption of computer-based formative assessment in a
>high school mathematics classroom. Journal of Cases on Information
>Technology, 13(4), 9-20.
>REPLY goes to sender only
>REPLY ALL goes to list members
>This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
>may contain confidential information. If you have received this message
>in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please
>do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or
>in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this
>email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of
>Nottingham.
>
>This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>attachment
>may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer
>system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications
>with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK
>legislation.
>
>
>
>


The Institute of Education: Number 1 worldwide for Education, 2014 QS World University Rankings