[Maths-Education] Re: Jo Boaler

[John Bibby]

It all seems very unpleasant. It's a tough world out there and Jo is a
tough person.  Good for her!

I would be most concerned about this accusation from Jo:

   - "Milgram and Bishop attempted aggressively to identify my research
   subjects  .... Bishop contacted numerous school district officials,
   including principals, and pressured them to disclose whether they were
   subjects of my study.  Among other tactics, he threatened to take legal
   action against them.  "

I assume this accusation can be made to stand up. It seems appalling.

All strength to Jo's elbow!

JOHN BIBBY



On 8 November 2012 17:23, Peter Gates <Peter.Gates at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:

> Dear Mathematics Educators and Friends,
> On November 1, Dr Jo Boaler addressed the PME-NA community to discuss the
> importance of communicating our research with broader audiences and
> recognizing and facing the challenging political climates in which we work.
>  However, she also shared a disturbing story of the unrelenting and unfair
> attacks she has been subjected to from a few individuals in the
> "mathematically correct" community.  In bravely sharing this story, she
> made it evident that there have been serious breaches of academic rules
> (keeping sources of data private) and of ethical behavior (harassment and
> vindictive personal attacks on Jo Boaler). In threatening her academic
> freedom-i.e., her freedom to conduct research without harassment-and in
> insisting on posting in a public space an article that breaks
> confidentiality and is inaccurate, these actions also threaten our
> fundamental values.  Jo Boaler is a valued and respected member of our
> community, and we should not stand by and see such activity without lodging
> a protest. Furthermore, we see the attacks on the work of Professor Boaler
> as an attack on the work of the whole mathematics education community
> toward the improvement of the teaching and learning of mathematics, and
> lack of action on the part of Stanford continues to harm our community and
> our work.
> For these reasons, we request that you:
> a)    Make your own judgment by reading Jo Boaler's personal statement,
> posted at http://www.stanford.edu/~joboaler/<
> https://mail.lsbu.ac.uk/owa/redir.aspx?C=HabvE9Q6JUKADB59yEUhWUSIzsdXkM8IJT7Gj4swWa4BAWAoKPQ0UQpVCt_ExBfRvlxy1PJ8JYg.&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.stanford.edu%2f%7ejoboaler%2f>
> outlining the events and the article in question posted at
> ftp://math.stanford.edu/pub/papers/milgram/combined-evaluations-version3.pdf
> b)    Then we hope you choose to act by either or both:
> i.      Signing the petition found at
> http://www.change.org/petitions/the-community-of-mathematics-educators-join-in-defending-fundamental-values
> ii.    Sending a personal letter to the president and provost of Stanford.
>  If you could email those (President Hennessy,(president at stanford.edu
> <mailto:president at stanford.edu>), Provost Etchemendy (etch at stanford.edu
> <mailto:etch at stanford.edu>), and blind copy Jo Boaler (
> joboaler at stanford.edu<mailto:joboaler at stanford.edu>), that would be ideal.
> Please join the PME-NA community in responding to this unfair and
> unacceptable circumstance as soon as possible.  We believe that Stanford
> University is currently reviewing the situation and tends to underestimate
> its potential negative effects on our colleague and on our community of
> scholars as a whole.  Academic freedom is the basis of all of our scholarly
> work.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> Professor Stephen Lerman
> Department of Education
> London South Bank University
> 103 Borough Road
> LONDON SE1 0AA
> United Kingdom
> Tel: +44 (0)20 7815 7440
> Fax: +44 (0)20 7815 8160
> url: https://sites.google.com/site/lermansteve/home
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do
> not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in
> any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this
> email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>